Lands on Schedule C, Part III — Cost of goods sold — or not, if you take the exception
If you only sell labour and the customer brings the parts, this article is not for you — with nothing bought for resale there is no cost of goods sold and no Part III to fill in. This is for the shop that stocks parts.
Every year a small shop asks the same question: am I small enough to skip inventory accounting? It is a reasonable question with a published answer.
There are four published answers. They do not agree.
The short answer
| Source | What it prints |
|---|---|
| Publication 334 (2025) | "average annual gross receipts of $10 million or less for the three prior tax years" |
| Publication 538 (Rev. Jan 2022) | "average annual gross receipts of $26 million or less" — "indexed for inflation" |
| Instructions for Schedule C (2025) | No figure. Defers to section 448(c), and says "See Pub. 538" |
| Rev. Proc. 2025-32, for 2026 | $32,000,000 |
Four IRS sources, three numbers and a redirect. And for a repair shop, not one of them changes the answer.
Which one governs
The chain runs in one direction and it is worth following once.
The form's own instructions are what you file by, and they do not print a number — they defer to section 448(c). Section 448(c) sets a gross receipts test whose amount is adjusted for inflation and published each year in a revenue procedure. For taxable years beginning in 2026 that is Revenue Procedure 2025-32:
"the average annual gross receipts of such entity for the 3-taxable-year period ending with the taxable year which precedes such taxable year does not exceed $32,000,000"
So $32,000,000 is the 2026 figure, because that is where the instructions point.
Publication 538 is not wrong so much as old: it is the January 2022 revision, it prints $26 million, and it says in the same breath that the amount is indexed for inflation — which is the publication telling you that its own figure will age. It has.
Publication 334's $10 million is the one this site cannot reconcile, and rather than guess at why, the honest position is the one the chain gives: a figure printed without the section 448(c) link behind it is the one to check, not the one to file by. That is not a claim that the publication is in error. It is a claim about which source answers this question.
Why none of it matters to you
Here is the part worth the afternoon it saves.
Auto repair and maintenance: 465,852 sole proprietorship returns, averaging $88,612 of business receipts each.
| The threshold you were worried about | Your receipts | Margin |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000,000 | ~$88,612 | 112× |
| $26,000,000 | ~$88,612 | 293× |
| $32,000,000 | ~$88,612 | 361× |
You qualify under the strictest reading anyone could take. The question that felt like it needed resolving does not need resolving — and that is worth knowing before spending a Saturday on it.
The decision that is actually yours
Qualifying is not the end of it. It opens a choice, and Publication 538 states both options:
"a small business taxpayer can account for inventory by (a) treating the inventory as non-incidental materials and supplies, or (b) conforming to its treatment of inventory in an applicable financial statement"
Two permitted methods. They are not the same, and the difference is when the cost of a part reaches your return — which for a shop holding thousands of dollars of stock at year end is the whole question.
This site is not going to tell you which to pick. The detail that decides it lives in the regulations rather than in the plain-language publications, and that gap is itself part of why small shops get this wrong — the accessible sources explain the exception and stop short of the mechanics. It is one conversation with a qualified tax professional, and then the same treatment every year afterwards. Changing methods is not a free decision either.
What this page can do is stop you answering the wrong question first.
For the shop that does keep inventory
If you use the ordinary method, Part III of Schedule C is the arithmetic: beginning inventory plus purchases, labour, materials and other costs, less ending inventory, carried to the front of the form.
And the trap there is a different one — it catches shops that load up on parts in December expecting a deduction. Stock bought is not stock deducted; the timing is not what the cheque date suggests.
Two things that are not this rule
Tools and equipment. A lift, a scanner, a press — these are not inventory at all. They have their own routes: the de minimis election under $2,500 or section 179 with its income limit.
Sublet work. Sending a job to a machine shop or a transmission specialist is a payment in the course of your trade or business, and it can be reportable. That is the other side of the 1099 question and has nothing to do with inventory.
What this reduces to
- You are a small business taxpayer. By a factor of a hundred, under any of the figures.
- The 2026 number, if you ever need it, is $32,000,000 — from the revenue procedure the Schedule C instructions point at.
- Choose a method once, with advice, and keep it.
- Do not spend another year on step one.
Common questions
Do I have to keep inventory records for the parts I stock?
What is the gross receipts limit?
So which figure actually applies for 2026?
Is Publication 334 wrong then?
Does any of this change what I do?
Then what does qualifying actually let me do?
Which of the two should I pick?
What goes in Part III of Schedule C?
I only charge labour and the customer supplies the parts. Does this apply to me?
I sublet work to another shop. Is that a 1099 question?
This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute tax, legal, or financial advice. Consult a qualified tax professional about your situation.